Iran’s calculation in targeting the UAE failed, a researcher specialising in Iranian and Center East affairs has stated, pointing to the nation’s army energy and disciplined defence posture.
Fatmah Alzeyoudi, a researcher on the Emirates Centre for Strategic Research and Analysis (ECSSR), stated Tehran could have focused the UAE partly to undermine its position as one of many area’s main success tales.
“It seems that the Iranian regime considered the UAE because the area’s most superior fashions of prosperity, improvement, and financial success,” Alzeyoudi informed Khaleej Occasions. “From this attitude, concentrating on the UAE was meant not solely to exert stress, but in addition to undermine its picture as a number one regional mannequin and divert consideration from the weaknesses and deterioration of Iran’s personal financial and developmental mannequin.”
Stay up to date with the latest news. Follow KT on WhatsApp Channels.
She stated this was evident from the early stages of the war, when Iranian threats prolonged past army targets to civilian and financial infrastructure with no direct army perform.
Alzeyoudi pointed to threats towards Emirati cities, in addition to experiences by the Iranian government-affiliated Mehr Information Company referring to potential strikes towards the Barakah Nuclear Power Plant, Jebel Ali and the Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum Photo voltaic Park.
“The UAE demonstrated that its energy extends past its superior financial system to its growing military capabilities and the strategic, disciplined imaginative and prescient underpinning its defence posture.”
Her evaluation comes because the area marks six months since Iran first attacked the UAE and different Gulf nations, a interval that has raised questions on deterrence, collective Gulf safety and the way states put together for the spillover of conflicts by which they don’t seem to be immediately concerned.
UAE technique didn’t essentially change
Alzeyoudi stated the disaster had not triggered the UAE to desert its longstanding help for de-escalation.
What the battle had strengthened, nevertheless, was the significance of creating various choices and diversifying strategic partnerships to guard the UAE’s long-term pursuits.
She cited Fujairah Port and efforts to cut back reliance on the Strait of Hormuz for example of that strategic considering.
“It displays not solely an effort to develop options for the UAE itself, but in addition a broader imaginative and prescient to offer viable choices for neighbouring states, rooted within the UAE’s sense of regional duty whereas additionally serving the broader financial pursuits of the worldwide group,” she stated.
The battle had additionally demonstrated how nations should more and more put together for threats arising from wars by which they don’t seem to be direct individuals, Alzeyoudi stated.
“There is no such thing as a doubt that the character of warfare has modified, not solely by way of the scope of uneven and hybrid warfare, but in addition within the extent to which targets are actually being struck that aren’t immediately social gathering to the battle,” she stated.
Larger Gulf defence coordination
Alzeyoudi stated the expertise had strengthened the case for deeper defence coordination amongst GCC states.
Strengthening that coordination, she added, would assist create a stronger deterrence framework, guaranteeing that Iran or some other state or non-state actor would “assume twice” earlier than contemplating an assault on a GCC nation.
She stated future Gulf collective defence ought to construct on current frameworks and develop right into a “extra built-in and complete safety structure”.
“Such an strategy might strengthen the GCC’s skill to deal with threats from all angles and improve collective safety, resilience, and deterrence throughout the Gulf,” she stated.
Alzeyoudi additionally argued that the warfare had demonstrated that the UAE’s resilience planning had been developed effectively earlier than the battle.
Each warfare would inevitably create new challenges and expose vulnerabilities, she added, making steady planning important to getting ready for future threats.
Dialogue stays obligatory
Regardless of the occasions of the previous six months, Alzeyoudi stated the UAE and different Gulf states wouldn’t abandon engagement with Iran.
“Diplomatic dialogue will proceed as a regional necessity,” she stated.
However dialogue by itself was not sufficient; it “have to be accompanied by credible safety preparations and tangible ensures from Iran”.
