A earlier MRI doesn’t guarantee affected person security in any manner for future MRI examinations
Christos Tsiotsios
The much less is understood about an implant, the extra cautious radiographers have to be, Tsiotsios suggested, describing his method as an “identification pyramid”: beginning with the implant card and producer’s web site because the gold normal, then working down by way of digital well being information, surgical notes, specialist databases comparable to MRIsafety.com or MagResource.com, prior imaging, and at last plain radiography or CT. Crucially, he warned, ‘a earlier MRI doesn’t guarantee affected person security in any manner for future MRI examinations.’ The professional singled out intracranial aneurysm clips as a specific class of concern: scanning should not proceed till the particular producer, mannequin, and kind have been confirmed, as the consequences of error can be fatal.10 ‘For unknown passive implants, the coverage needs to be a collaborative effort between the supervising doctor, the radiographer, and the medical physicist,’ Tsiotsios suggested.
Trying forward, the professional mentioned the potential of artificial intelligence to help with pre-examination implant identification by analysing digital well being information and prior imaging, with studies already reporting accuracy above 80%.11 Whereas these AI system present nice promise for enhancing workflow effectivity and MRI security, knowledge privateness and validation challenges should be addressed, and human oversight stays important, he concluded: ‘The label offers the boundaries, however the scientific crew ensures affected person security.’
Profiles:
Dr Simone Busoni is a senior medical physicist on the UOC Medical Physics division of Careggi College Hospital in Florence, Italy, the place he holds a Degree III Radiation Safety Knowledgeable qualification — the best certification stage in Italy. He serves as coordinator of the EFOMP working group answerable for revising Coverage Assertion 14 on MRI Security, the European reference framework for secure MRI follow, and is a member of the ESR Radiology MR Security and High quality Subcommittee.
Prof. Siegfried Trattnig is Professor of Radiology with a specialist deal with high-field MRI on the Medical College of Vienna, Austria. Since 2000, he has served as Medical Director of the College of Vienna’s high-field MR analysis scanner, and since its founding in 2003, as Director of the Excessive Discipline MR Centre of Excellence on the Medical College of Vienna. He has been a member of greater than 50 committees throughout the most important worldwide societies in radiology, orthopaedics, and MR imaging, together with the ESR Analysis Committee Board; he has served as Chairman of the European Imaging Biomarker Alliance of the ESR, Chairman of the ISMRM Musculoskeletal Research Group, and Director of the Faculty of MRI of the ESMRMB. He sits on the editorial boards of seven peer-reviewed journals and has authored over 500 listed publications in PubMed in addition to 24 guide chapters.
Edwin H.G. Oei, MD, PhD, is Affiliate Professor of Musculoskeletal Imaging and Part Chief of Musculoskeletal Radiology within the Division of Radiology and Nuclear Medication at Erasmus MC, College Medical Heart, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. As principal investigator of the Superior Musculoskeletal Imaging Analysis group at Erasmus MC (ADMIRE), his analysis focuses on multi-parametric MRI, CT, and ultrasound imaging of diseased joints. His work encompasses the technical improvement, validation, and implementation of novel MR methods in giant scientific and population-based research.
Christos Tsiotsios, MSc, is Head of Radiographers at Markides MRI and Diagnostic Imaging in Limassol, Cyprus, and a part-time teacher on the European College of Cyprus in Nicosia. He specialises in MR security, with a specific deal with the sensible administration of sufferers with passive implants in scientific radiography follow.
References:
- Nordin LE, Åberg K, Kihlborg J et al.: ESR Essentials: basic physics of MR safety—practice recommendations by the European Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and Biology; European Radiology 2024
- European Society of Radiology (ESR): The European MR safety landscape; Insights into Imaging 2024
- Pogliacomi F, Schiavi P, Calderazzi F et al.: Is there a relation between clinical scores and serum ion levels after MoM-THA? One year results in 383 implants; Acta Biomedica 2020
- Bruschetta A, Palco M, Fenga D et al.: How to Manage Metallosis: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis after Revision Hip Surgery; Journal of Clinical Medicine 2023
- Feuerriegel GC, Sutter R: Managing hardware-related metal artifacts in MRI: current and evolving techniques; Skeletal Radiology 2024
- Kim Yj, Yoon D, Song SO, Lee S, Choo HJ, Ryu J: Metal Artifacts in Postoperative Spine MRI: Strategies and Limitations; Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2025
- Luitjens J, Ziegeler K, Yoon D et al.: Improved metal suppression using new generation low-field MRI: a biophantom feasibility study; Skeletal Radiology 2024
- Aboelmagd S, Malcolm P, Toms A: Magnetic resonance imaging of metal artifact reduction sequences in the assessment of metal-on-metal hip prostheses; Reports in Medical Imaging 2014
- Ziegeler K, Yoon D, Hoff M, Theologis AA: Metal Suppression Magnetic Resonance Imaging Techniques in Orthopaedic and Spine Surgery; Journal of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons 2025
- Klucznik RP, Carrier DA, Pyka R, Haid RW: Placement of a ferromagnetic intracerebral aneurysm clip in a magnetic field with a fatal outcome; Radiology 1993
- Valtchinov VI, Lacson R, Wang AW, Khorasani R: Comparing Artificial Intelligence Approaches to Retrieve Clinical Reports Documenting Implantable Devices Posing MRI Safety Risks; Journal of the American College of Radiology 2020