NEW DELHI: The prime accused within the homicide of 21-year-old mannequin Muskan allegedly took her iPhone after the killing, with police suspecting that he might have wished to delete textual content messages and chats and erase his digital path, sources mentioned.Police are actually inspecting the telephone and different digital proof to find out whether or not any messages or conversations had been deleted after the homicide.Investigators are additionally trying into Muskan’s interactions with individuals recognized to her as a part of the probe into the motive.The event has emerged as investigators piece collectively Imran’s actions after the homicide.Police mentioned he allegedly fled the crime scene with Muskan’s telephone and stored altering areas to evade arrest.Based on police, Imran allegedly took Muskan’s iPhone after killing her.Investigators suspect that he might have meant to take away textual content messages, chats or different data that might have supplied clues in regards to the crime.The investigation can also be targeted on figuring out whether or not Imran had been involved with Muskan shortly earlier than the assault.Muskan’s household had earlier instructed police that she had allegedly been harassed by Imran for a very long time. Police additionally suspect Imran was upset as a result of he believed Muskan was talking to a different man.
Imran arrested after firing at police
The investigation took a dramatic activate Thursday when a police workforce traced Imran to Rajouri Backyard.DCP (West) Hareshwar Swami mentioned a workforce noticed a suspicious individual close to the sub-registrar’s workplace and recognized him as Imran.When police tried to apprehend him, he allegedly opened hearth at them.Police retaliated, triggering an change of fireside during which Imran sustained bullet accidents to each legs. 11 rounds had been fired in the course of the encounter, with Imran allegedly firing 4 rounds and police firing seven.Three of the police rounds hit Imran in his knees. He was subsequently taken to hospital and stays beneath therapy.As Imran is hospitalised, investigators haven’t but been in a position to query him in regards to the supply of the weapon or the motive behind Muskan’s homicide.
Imran has earlier prison circumstances
Police inquiry has additionally revealed that Imran was booked beneath the POCSO Act in 2018 for allegedly sexually harassing a minor in Tilak Nagar.The case additionally invoked provisions associated to voluntarily inflicting damage, stalking, outraging the modesty of a lady, and customary intention.Police mentioned this was not his first prison case. In 2021, he was additionally allegedly concerned in a culpable murder case.Based on the complainant, Imran had allegedly attacked a person with a stone slab on the night time of October 30, 2020. The person suffered critical head accidents, went right into a coma and remained hospitalised for six days.A case was registered the next 12 months on the courtroom’s orders.
Police look at social media path
Investigators are additionally inspecting Imran’s social media exercise for doable clues.His Instagram profile comprises posts associated to gymnasium exercises and cricket. Police have additionally come throughout a video uploaded from his account in 2019 during which a gaggle of males may be seen sitting inside a room.Within the video, one of many males is seen smoking earlier than allegedly pulling out a pistol and firing three rounds into the air.Police are inspecting the account and different digital proof to find out whether or not they can make clear Imran’s background, associates or actions.
What occurred to Muskan?
Muskan, 21, was allegedly stabbed a number of instances within the stomach inside her house in Delhi.The incident had prompted a heavy police deployment within the space as investigators launched a hunt for the accused.Police ultimately arrested Imran following the encounter in Rajouri Backyard.The investigation is now targeted on establishing the sequence of occasions resulting in the homicide and whether or not the accused tried to destroy or conceal digital proof after the killing.
