Justice V Srishananda rejected the petitions filed by Prajashakti Channel Managing Director Shabbir Pasha and CEO V Kusuma, looking for quashing of the legal case.
Throughout the listening to, the Courtroom took robust exception to the language employed by the petitioners and the insinuations made by them within the video.
“The background voice in this system is yours. You’re the one who stated that the Deputy Chief Minister is in love with the District Collector. Wouldn’t it be okay if anyone communicate like this to the daughters of your own home? Do you alone have safety of Article 21 of the Structure? Do not they?” the bench requested.
The Courtroom additionally questioned the accused in regards to the impression such allegations might have on the dignity and popularity of the Deputy Commissioner and her relations, notably her kids.
“You have been arrested after accumulating and checking your voice pattern. Is it your job that to destroy different folks home morning to nighttime? Are there no daughters in your own home? Would not District Collector get upset if stated that she had a relationship with a minister? Do not they’ve kids? Does not Article 21 of the Structure apply to them? If the kid of District Collector isasked at school that your mom had relationship with a minister, wouldn’t it not damage her? Should not they reside with dignity? Do not you already know that you’re saying this to a District Collector?” the bench requested.
