4 min learnKochiAug 17, 2026 04:50 PM IST
As actor Anupama Parameswaran’s current explosive revelations about a toxic past relationship acquire momentum, netizens have began rewatching her earlier interviews — notably those the place she shared the house with actor Dhruv Vikram, whom she was rumoured to be dating — to see if they will discover traces of her allegations.
In the meantime, some eagle-eyed netizens lately unearthed a 2025 interview that includes the 2 stars, through which, at one level, she made remarks that hinted at her current allegations that the poisonous boyfriend managed just about all features of her private {and professional} life. Within the interview, she mentioned Dhruv determined what she and the remainder of the staff behind their movie Bison Kaalamaadan (2025), directed by Mari Selvaraj, posted on social media.
‘Dhruv selects all photos we put up’: Anupama’s viral remark resurfaces
Whereas selling the film, Anupama Parameswaran and Dhruv Vikram appeared collectively on Nikhil Vijayendra Simha’s podcast. Because the dialog progressed, Anupama was heard saying, “It’s important to be very cautious as a result of Dhruv selects all photos of what all of us put up.” Greatly surprised by her sudden remark, Dhruv replied, “You shouldn’t feed him (the host) fodder for all this (to make rage-bait and click-bait content material).”
Anupama rapidly clarified, “What I imply is, now, for promotions, Rajisha Vijayan (actor), I, Nivas Okay Prasanna (composer), Mari Selvaraj sir, and Dhruv click on a number of photos. In that, I’ve no voice, nor do others. We don’t say something; now we have no opinions. So, he selects all of it. He chooses which photos we glance good in to put up. Rajisha and I might have made faces in most pictures.”
Nonetheless, neither Anupama nor Dhruv seemed nervous in these moments, and the scene didn’t develop tense afterwards. Bison Kaalamaadan, which turned a vital and business success, was the one film through which the 2 of them appeared collectively.
Anupama Parameswaran on surviving narcissistic abuse
Throughout a current dialog with Dhanya Varma, Anupama Parameswaran talked in depth in regards to the poisonous previous relationship. Though she didn’t title her ex-boyfriend, many concluded that it was Dhruv Vikram, the son of famous Tamil star Vikram.
Stating that she suffered “narcissistic abuse” for about two years in that relationship, Anupama mentioned that after some extent, he started altering her drastically with out her even noticing it.
Story continues under this advert
“Many individuals will not be conscious of narcissistic abuse. At some point he will likely be Remo. We will likely be showered with love and care and can probably really feel just like the luckiest particular person alive. Nonetheless, the following day he will likely be Anniyan. It is going to be probably the most brutal aspect, and he won’t care a hoot about what is going on round him. The identical particular person will play Ambi the following day, apologising to me for his errors and crying like a child. He’ll promise to by no means repeat the errors, however then once more the love cycle continues,” she mentioned.
Anupama added, “He began exerting management over the whole lot in my life. Why didn’t I promote Dragon (2025), one of many greatest hits of my profession? I needed to drop many initiatives I used to be presupposed to do. There have been direct interventions (from him) in issues that have been fully beneath my management. To be very trustworthy, I used to be in a state the place I might break into tears if somebody merely requested, ‘How are you?’ All through my profession, I all the time maintained very excessive skilled ethics, but when I behaved unprofessionally and with out ethics over the previous two years, it was due to that particular person’s management over me.”
Disclaimer: This text displays private reflections and viral social media discussions surrounding celeb relationships, which haven’t been independently verified. Content material touching upon relationship dynamics or emotional misery is shared strictly for normal informational and editorial functions and doesn’t represent psychological, authorized, or skilled recommendation.
