The Delhi Excessive Court docket has denied bail to a person accused of murdering his spouse, chopping her physique into items and dumping the stays in a septic tank. [2026 LiveLaw (Del) 775]
Justice Girish Kathpalia noticed that the “grotesque method” during which the crime was dedicated can’t be ignored whereas contemplating bail.
The Court docket dismissed the bail utility filed by one Ashu Pal in relation to an FIR registered at Police Station Prem Nagar for the offences beneath Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
The Delhi Police alleged that on February 22, 2019, Pal went to the police station and said that he had killed his spouse, chopped her physique into items and dumped the stays in a septic tank.
Whereas he was being interrogated, a PCR name was acquired from the deceased’s brother stating that she had been killed and that her physique had been recovered from the septic tank.
The deceased’s brother had alleged in his grievance that since she had given delivery to a few daughters, Pal and his members of the family used to torture her and demand dowry.
The prosecution additional alleged that Pal known as the deceased’s mom and instructed her that he had murdered his spouse. When the deceased’s brother visited the accused’s home, he allegedly discovered blood stains and the lady’s physique within the septic tank.
Looking for bail, Pal’s counsel argued that there have been materials contradictions within the testimonies of the deceased’s mom and brother. It was additionally argued that the accused had by no means visited the police station to admit to the crime and that the trial was continuing at a sluggish tempo.
Then again, the prosecution submitted that the trial was under no circumstances sluggish in tempo and the allegations in opposition to the accused disentitled him of bail.
It was additionally submitted that the blood-stained weapon allegedly utilized in chopping off the lifeless physique of the deceased and her garments and jewelry, and so on. had been recovered and had been examined forensically.
Dismissing the bail plea, the Court docket mentioned that whereas delay in trial is a floor for grant of bail however it isn’t the one floor.
Justice Kathpalia mentioned that whereas contemplating grant or denial of bail, the courtroom can not shut its eyes to the grotesque method during which a woman was killed adopted by chopping off of her physique and throwing her within the septic tank.
“Contemplating the above circumstances, I don’t discover it a match case to grant bail to the accused/applicant. Subsequently, the bail utility is dismissed,” the Court docket mentioned.
Title: ASHU PAL v. THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
Quotation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 775
