Thursday, August 6, 2026 Login
Breaking
Cricket match highlights | LDN vs MIL, 23rd Match, The Hundred Men's Competition 2026 – Cricbuzz Predicting Microelectronics Performance with Physics-Informed Artificial Intelligence Karnataka High Court transfers Malur judge after road rage controversy Pakistan Asim Munir crackdown on Islamists over blasphemy to win over Trump Titles change hands at AEW Grand Slam Mexico
India

Did reducing Jammu and Kashmir to a UT and abrogating its special status make a difference?

National Conference members at a recent protest in Jammu over the removal of special status of J&K. PTI -

National Conference members at a recent protest in Jammu over the removal of special status of J&K. PTI –
| Photo Credit: –

Seven years have passed since the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) introduced legislations in Parliament to implement its long-standing objective — stripping the special status accorded to the State of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) by Article 370 of the Constitution. Through these legislations, the Union government not only abrogated the special status, but also took direct control of the State’s administration by bifurcating it into two Union Territories — J&K and Ladakh.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah, who introduced the legislations in both Houses, projected them as a panacea for J&K’s woes. Attributing the State’s poor healthcare, poverty and slow economic growth to the special status, he argued that Article 370 prevented J&K’s economic development while breeding terrorism.

Source link

Related Stories

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *