The deja vu on the crimson carpet
In an August 29 interview with NDTV, he shared his candid tackle plagiarised couture after Urvashi confronted on-line backlash for sporting a design strikingly just like the enduring Abu Jani-Sandeep Khosla saree, made famous by supermodel Gigi Hadid.
The style drama unfolded on the 2026 Cannes Movie Pageant, the place Urvashi stepped out in an ivory chikankari-style saree paired with an intricate, heavy, gold-jewelled shirt. Style fans instantly recognised the design as a near-identical reproduction of the bespoke Abu Jani-Sandeep Khosla creation Gigi Hadid wore in March 2023 through the grand opening of the Nita Mukesh Ambani Cultural Centre (NMACC) in Mumbai.
Gigi’s hand-embroidered authentic took a few yr to craft, whereas Urvashi’s 2026 look—created by a distinct label (Mihir Designer Studio) — drew sharp criticism on-line and was dubbed a ‘gandi copy’ by fashion watchdogs.
‘Urvashi is sporting a precise copy of our garment’
When requested in regards to the rising prevalence of low-cost replicas in Indian luxurious vogue, Sandeep addressed the incident immediately through the NDTV interview: “If you wish to plagiarise and also you wish to copy, make a greater model of what we’re doing.”
Recalling his response to seeing Urvashi’s copied look on-line, he shared his shock: “Simply the opposite day I used to be seeing, there is a girl referred to as Urvashi Rautela, I believe, who wore a replica of ours, of Gigi Hadid… and there was an influencer doing a complete put up on how one can get an authentic Abu Jani-Sandeep Khosla outfit made the place Urvashi acquired it made.”
Past the reproduction itself, he expressed disappointment over how such knockoffs have been normalised on social media: “Firstly, Urvashi is sporting a precise copy of our garment with out a thought. Both she has no publicity, or she has an excessive amount of publicity. After which, the particular person (influencer) is definitely encouraging the copies to occur, which I discover actually… there needs to be at the very least some distinction, or do some… it ought to be a take of an artist themselves to do one thing else. Additionally, that is referred to as very straightforward vogue.”
Sandeep’s critique underscored a broader debate throughout the vogue trade relating to mental property, fast-fashion knockoffs, and crimson carpet authenticity. Whereas celebrities typically try to recreate viral sartorial moments, his assertion served as a reminder that true craftsmanship can’t be simply duplicated.
