In a pointy critique of police motion on the current pupil protests, Supreme Courtroom decide Justice Ujjal Bhuyan on Friday mentioned that the detachment anticipated of cops seems to be disappearing. He mentioned it was very distressing to see cops assaulting protesters.
“All of us are dismayed after we see younger officers of the Indian Police Service personally going and assaulting protesters and demonstrators. That is one thing very, very distressing to watch,” Justice Bhuyan mentioned on the launch of retired IPS officer Yashovardhan Azad’s e-book ‘Policing the Republic’.
“The detachment anticipated of cops one way or the other appears to be disappearing, and that is certainly a matter of grave concern,” he added.
Read | Supreme Court Cancels All FIRs Against CJP Protesters, Criminal Antecedents Only Exception
Justice Bhuyan mentioned that efficient policing could possibly be executed with out resorting to extreme use of pressure or infringement of human rights. “For commonest individuals, a policeman on the road sporting a whistle and a lathi represents the facility and authority of the state. Once they really feel wronged, they search the assistance of the police. It’s, due to this fact, of utmost significance that the police pressure maintains its credibility,” he mentioned.
VIDEO | New Delhi: “Police personnel assaulting protesters is distressing; it’s a matter of grave concern,” says Justice Ujjal Bhuyan on police motion at Jantar Mantar, on the launch of retired IPS officer Yashovardhan Azad’s e-book ‘Policing the Republic’. pic.twitter.com/BSF0qdY3Nn
— Press Belief of India (@PTI_News) September 4, 2026
Police and paramilitary motion on pupil protesters throughout the CJP protest has come underneath sharp criticism from varied quarters. The matter reached the Supreme Courtroom, which has arrange a high-level panel to research allegations of extreme pressure by the Delhi Police throughout the July 20 pupil protests at Jantar Mantar and the Parliament march.
The panel headed by former Supreme Courtroom decide Justice R Subhash Reddy will look at complaints of lathi prices, tear gasoline, pellet gun utilization, digital batons, and focused harassment or molestation of feminine protesters, alongside reviewing CCTV and video footage of the clashes.
Read | Supreme Court Sets Up Panel To Probe Cop Action, Violence During NEET Protests
Justice Bhuyan additionally talked about the rising circumstances of custodial torture and deaths within the nation and mentioned it is among the worst crimes in a civilised society.
“Custodial demise is probably one of many worst crimes in a civilised society ruled by the rule of regulation. Any type of torture, of merciless, inhuman, or degrading therapy would fall inside the inhibition of Article 29, whether or not it happens throughout investigation, interrogation or in any other case,” he mentioned.
He identified that when functionaries of presidency turn into lawbreakers, it will possibly encourage lawlessness.”If the functionaries of the federal government turn into lawbreakers, it’s sure to breed contempt for the regulation and can encourage lawlessness. No civilised nation can allow that to occur. Does a citizen shed his elementary proper the second a policeman arrests him?” he mentioned.
Justice Bhuyan additionally touched upon the problem of extra-judicial killings or “faux encounters”, saying the Supreme Courtroom had taken a critical view of such incidents.
Referring to a 2011 judgment, he mentioned the court docket had held that faux encounters “nullify the very essence of the rule of regulation” and noticed that when a faux encounter is proved in opposition to a serving policeman in a trial, it should be handled with the utmost seriousness.
“Encounter philosophy is a legal philosophy. It can’t be part of policing,” Justice Bhuyan mentioned.
