The functions have been moved within the revision plea filed by the CBI in opposition to the trial court docket’s order of February 27, 2026. They elevate preliminary objections to the maintainability of CBI’s case.
One of many grounds raised by Kejriwal and Sisodia is that the revision plea was filed inside 4 hours of the trial court docket judgment with “unprecedented haste” and within the “most unserious method”. It has been argued that the revision petition doesn’t level out any particular illegality/discrepancies within the trial court docket judgement.
“That the current omnibus CBI petition didn’t even plead- in opposition to every accused individual particularly – as to how the discharge order is an order handed with none proof or that materials proof is ignored qua the particular accused or which discovering -in which para- for which accused- quantities to judicial discretion is exercised arbitrarily or perversely. That CBI has additionally failed to provide any proof, materials or paperwork with the current Revision Petition to indicate the perversity within the order of discharge,” Sisodia stated in his software.
Additional, it has been said that because of submitting of such “bare-shell, omnibus and non-specific petition”, prejudice is being prompted to the respondents as they’re unable to discern the case they’ve to satisfy.
The functions are more likely to come up for listening to earlier than Justice Manoj Jain on August 18.
