Friday, August 7, 2026 Login
Breaking
Why Gen Z Faces More Sleep Problem Than Ever: Late Nights, Stress, Screens ‘Save me’: Eyewitness recounts Atiq Ahmed’s son Abaan’s last words after fatal crash | Lucknow News Two coasts, three fee formulas, one Supreme Leader still to sign: The versions of Iran-Oman deal on Strait of Hormuz | Hindustan Times – hindustantimes.com Box Office Analysis: Spider-Man: Brand New Day is pan-India in footfalls, English-led in revenue; 3D powers 77% of six-day business :Bollywood Box Office Tom Clancy’s Ghost Recon Wildlands Launches Last Rites Update To Celebrate The Series 25th Anniversary
India

Did reducing Jammu and Kashmir to a UT and abrogating its special status make a difference?

National Conference members at a recent protest in Jammu over the removal of special status of J&K. PTI -

National Conference members at a recent protest in Jammu over the removal of special status of J&K. PTI –
| Photo Credit: –

Seven years have passed since the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) introduced legislations in Parliament to implement its long-standing objective — stripping the special status accorded to the State of Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) by Article 370 of the Constitution. Through these legislations, the Union government not only abrogated the special status, but also took direct control of the State’s administration by bifurcating it into two Union Territories — J&K and Ladakh.

Union Home Minister Amit Shah, who introduced the legislations in both Houses, projected them as a panacea for J&K’s woes. Attributing the State’s poor healthcare, poverty and slow economic growth to the special status, he argued that Article 370 prevented J&K’s economic development while breeding terrorism.

Source link

Related Stories

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *