Friday, August 7, 2026 Login
Breaking
Sukhbir Badal meets PM Modi ahead of Punjab Assembly polls, fuels SAD-BJP alliance chatter ‘Felt Like Piece Of Meat’: Sex Abuse Allegations Rock UK’s Top Army Training College For Teenagers | World News ‘The Last House’ Review: Wagner Moura and Greta Lee Are Locked Down Vivo S2 launched at Rs 39,999: Check price, camera, battery, specs, sale date and offers Ex Syndicate Bank chief Ajay Nanavati rejected higher pay for Rs 960 Tata job in 1977 shares why
World

Extensive climate-induced range shifts in butterflies across the globe

  • Pecl, G. T. et al. Biodiversity redistribution under climate change: impacts on ecosystems and human well-being. Science 355, eaai9214 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lenoir, J. et al. Species better track climate warming in the oceans than on land. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4, 1044–1059 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Parmesan, C. et al. Poleward shifts in geographical ranges of butterfly species associated with regional warming. Nature 399, 579–583 (1999).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chowdhury, S. et al. Strategic conservation of tropical insects. Preprint at EcoEvoRixv https://doi.org/10.32942/X2ZD1T (2025).

  • Thomas, C. D. et al. Extinction risk from climate change. Nature 427, 145–148 (2004).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jaureguiberry, P. et al. The direct drivers of recent global anthropogenic biodiversity loss. Sci. Adv. 8, eabm9982 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chen, I. C., Hill, J. K., Ohlemüller, R., Roy, D. B. & Thomas, C. D. Rapid range shifts of species associated with high levels of climate warming. Science 333, 1024–1026 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Devictor, V. et al. Differences in the climatic debts of birds and butterflies at a continental scale. Nat. Clim. Change 2, 121–124 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lenoir, J. & Svenning, J. C. Climate-related range shifts–a global multidimensional synthesis and new research directions. Ecography 38, 15–28 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chan, W. P. et al. Climate velocities and species tracking in global mountain regions. Nature 629, 114–120 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Vitasse, Y. et al. Phenological and elevational shifts of plants, animals and fungi under climate change in the European Alps. Biol. Rev. 96, 1816–1835 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Filazzola, A., Matter, S. F. & Roland, J. Inclusion of trophic interactions increases the vulnerability of an alpine butterfly species to climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 26, 2867–2877 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Braby, M. F., Bertelsmeier, C., Sanderson, C. & Thistleton, B. M. Spatial distribution and range expansion of the tawny coster butterfly, Acraea terpsicore (Linnaeus, 1758) (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae), in South-East Asia and Australia. Insect Conserv. Divers. 7, 132–143 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Freeman, B. G., Lee-Yaw, J. A., Sunday, J. M. & Hargreaves, A. L. Expanding, shifting and shrinking: the impact of global warming on species’ elevational distributions. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 27, 1268–1276 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chowdhury, S. Threatened species could be more vulnerable to climate change in tropical countries. Sci. Total Environ. 858, 159989 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Colwell, R. K. & Feeley, K. J. Still little evidence of poleward range shifts in the tropics, but lowland biotic attrition may be underway. Biotropica 57, e13358 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chowdhury, S., Braby, M. F., Fuller, R. A. & Zalucki, M. P. Coasting along to a wider range: niche conservatism in the recent range expansion of the tawny coster, Acraea terpsicore (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Divers. Distrib. 27, 402–415 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Neff, F. et al. Contrasting 50-year trends of moth communities depending on elevation and species traits. Ecol. Lett. 28, e70195 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Soifer, L. G. et al. Extreme events drive rapid and dynamic range fluctuations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 40, 862–873 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bertrand, R. et al. Changes in plant community composition lag behind climate warming in lowland forests. Nature 479, 517–520 (2011).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Feeley, K. J., Stroud, J. T. & Perez, T. M. Most ‘global’ reviews of species’ responses to climate change are not truly global. Divers. Distrib. 23, 231–234 (2017).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Taheri, S., Naimi, B., Rahbek, C. & Araújo, M. B. Improvements in reports of species redistribution under climate change are required. Sci. Adv. 7, eabe1110 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Díaz, S. & Malhi, Y. Biodiversity: concepts, patterns, trends, and perspectives. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 47, 31–63 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wagner, D. L., Grames, E. M., Forister, M. L., Berenbaum, M. R. & Stopak, D. Insect decline in the Anthropocene: death by a thousand cuts. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2023989118 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cooke, R. et al. Integrating multiple evidence streams to understand insect biodiversity change. Science 388, eadq2110 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Clements, H. S. et al. A place-based assessment of biodiversity intactness in sub-Saharan Africa. Nature 649, 113–121 (2026).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pinkert, S., Barve, V., Guralnick, R. & Jetz, W. Global geographical and latitudinal variation in butterfly species richness captured through a comprehensive country-level occurrence database. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 31, 830–839 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Freitas, A. V. L. et al. in Insect Decline and Conservation in the Neotropics (eds León-Cortés, J. L. & Córdoba-Aguilar, A.) 205–233 (Springer, 2024).

  • Bonebrake, T. C., Ponisio, L. C., Boggs, C. L. & Ehrlich, P. R. More than just indicators: a review of tropical butterfly ecology and conservation. Biol. Conserv. 143, 1831–1841 (2010).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sunde, J. et al. Century-long butterfly range expansions in northern Europe depend on climate, land use and species traits. Commun. Biol. 6, 601 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Gross, C. P., Kawahara, A. Y. & Daru, B. H. Climate and regional plant richness drive diet specialization in butterfly caterpillars. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.01.10.632438 (2025).

  • Riva, F. et al. Addressing gaps in butterfly population monitoring to catalyze global insect conservation. Conserv. Lett. 19, e70037 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pöyry, J., Luoto, M., Heikkinen, R. K., Kuussaari, M. & Saarinen, K. Species traits explain recent range shifts of Finnish butterflies. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 732–743 (2009).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kharouba, H. M., Lewthwaite, J. M., Guralnick, R., Kerr, J. T. & Vellend, M. Using insect natural history collections to study global change impacts: challenges and opportunities. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 374, 20170405 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hällfors, M. H. et al. Recent range shifts of moths, butterflies, and birds are driven by the breadth of their climatic niche. Evol. Lett. 8, 89–100 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • da Silva, C. R. & Diamond, S. E. Local climate change velocities and evolutionary history explain multidirectional range shifts in a North American butterfly assemblage. J. Anim. Ecol. 93, 1160–1171 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Antão, L. H. et al. Climate change reshuffles northern species within their niches. Nat. Clim. Change 12, 587–592 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Maes, D. & Van Dyck, H. Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe’s worst case scenario? Biol. Conserv. 99, 263–276 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Maes, D., Van Calster, H., Herremans, M. & Van Dyck, H. Challenges and bottlenecks for butterfly conservation in a highly anthropogenic region: Europe’s worst case scenario revisited. Biol. Conserv. 274, 109732 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Warren, M. S. et al. The decline of butterflies in Europe: problems, significance, and possible solutions. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2002551117 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilson, R. J., Gutierrez, D., Gutierrez, J. & Monserrat, V. J. An elevational shift in butterfly species richness and composition accompanying recent climate change. Glob. Change Biol. 13, 1873–1887 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chowdhury, S. et al. Growth of non-English-language literature on biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Biol. 36, e13883 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Deutsch, C. A. et al. Impacts of climate warming on terrestrial ectotherms across latitude. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 6668–6672 (2008).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wright, S. J., Muller-Landau, H. C. & Schipper, J. A. N. The future of tropical species on a warmer planet. Conserv. Biol. 23, 1418–1426 (2009).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Colwell, R. K., Brehm, G., Cardelús, C. L., Gilman, A. C. & Longino, J. T. Global warming, elevational range shifts, and lowland biotic attrition in the wet tropics. Science 322, 258–261 (2008).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pinkert, S., Farwig, N., Kawahara, A. Y. & Jetz, W. Global hotspots of butterfly diversity are threatened in a warming world. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 9, 789–800 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Heinecke, C., Kastner, F. & Fresse, E. Die Grossschmetterlinge (Makrolepidoptera) der Moore Oldenburgs (Deutschland, Niedersachsen) – Vorbereitung einer Langzeitstudie und erste Ergebnisse. Drosera 2011, 81–97 (2013).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Szentirmai, I. et al. Habitat use and population biology of the Danube clouded yellow butterfly Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) in Romania. J. Insect Conserv. 18, 417–425 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Braga, L., Ramos, R. R., Aguiar, T. M. C. & Freitas, A. V. L. Distribution extension of Godartiana byses (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae) and first record for the state of São Paulo, Brazil. J. Lepid. Soc. 72, 176–179 (2018).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Herlihy, M. V., Van Driesche, R. G. & Wagner, D. L. Persistence in Massachusetts of the veined white butterfly due to use of the invasive form of cuckoo flower. Biol. Invasions 16, 2713–2724 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lynch, A. J. et al. Managing for RADical ecosystem change: applying the Resist-Accept-Direct (RAD) framework. Front. Ecol. Environ. 19, 461–469 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Horak, J., Šafářová, L., Trombik, J. & Menendez, R. Patterns and determinants of plant, butterfly and beetle diversity reveal optimal city grassland management and green urban planning. Urban For. Urban Green. 73, 127609 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thomas, C. D. et al. A framework for species translocation: prospects of returning the black-veined white butterfly to England. Insect Conserv. Divers. https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12850 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Guo, F., Lenoir, J. & Bonebrake, T. C. Land-use change interacts with climate to determine elevational species redistribution. Nat. Commun. 9, 1315 (2018).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Bruschini, C. et al. Micro-habitat shifts by butterflies foster conservation strategies to preserve pollinator diversity in a warming Mediterranean climate. Ecol. Indic. 166, 112253 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Franzén, M. et al. Differences in phenology, daily timing of activity, and associations of temperature utilization with survival in three threatened butterflies. Sci. Rep. 12, 7534 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roy, D. B. et al. Similarities in butterfly emergence dates among populations suggest local adaptation to climate. Glob. Change Biol. 21, 3313–3322 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Quinn, R. M., Caston, K. J. & Roy, D. B. Coincidence in the distributions of butterflies and their foodplants. Ecography 21, 279–288 (1998).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Multigner, L. F., Bras, A., DiLeo, M. F. & Saastamoinen, M. Relative effects of habitat amount and fragmentation per se on genetic diversity of the Glanville fritillary butterfly. Mol. Ecol. 34, e70037 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lewthwaite, J. M. M. et al. Canadian butterfly climate debt is significant and correlated with range size. Ecography 41, 2005–2015 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wilson, R. J. & Fox, R. Insect responses to global change offer signposts for biodiversity and conservation. Ecol. Entomol. 46, 699–717 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Roy, D. B., Rothery, P., Moss, D., Pollard, E. & Thomas, J. A. Butterfly numbers and weather: predicting historical trends in abundance and the future effects of climate change. J. Anim. Ecol. 70, 201–217 (2001).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hill, G. M., Kawahara, A. Y., Daniels, J. C., Bateman, C. C. & Scheffers, B. R. Climate change effects on animal ecology: butterflies and moths as a case study. Biol. Rev. 96, 2113–2126 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Franzén, M. & Johannesson, M. Predicting extinction risk of butterflies and moths (Macrolepidoptera) from distribution patterns and species characteristics. J. Insect Conserv. 11, 367–390 (2007).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Settele, J. et al. Climatic risk atlas of European butterflies. BioRisk https://doi.org/10.3897/biorisk.1 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Colom, P., Traveset, A., Carreras, D. & Stefanescu, C. Spatio-temporal responses of butterflies to global warming on a Mediterranean island over two decades. Ecol. Entomol. 46, 262–272 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hayes, M. P. et al. Heatwave predicts a shady future for insects: impacts of an extreme weather event on a chalk grassland in Bedfordshire, UK. J. Insect Conserv. 28, 923–933 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brown, K. S. Jr & Freitas, A. V. L. Butterfly communities of urban forest fragments in Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil: structure, instability, environmental correlates, and conservation. J. Insect Conserv. 6, 217–231 (2002).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Cannon, A. J. Twelve months at 1.5 °C signals earlier than expected breach of Paris Agreement threshold. Nat. Clim. Change 15, 266–269 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Engels, A. et al. (eds) Hamburg Climate Futures Outlook 2023. The Plausibility of a 1.5°C Limit to Global Warming – Social Drivers and Physical Processes (Cluster of Excellence Climate, Climate Change, and Society (CLICCS), 2023); https://doi.org/10.25592/uhhfdm.11230

  • Suggitt, A. J. et al. Linking climate warming and land conversion to species’ range changes across Great Britain. Nat. Commun. 14, 6759 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Thomas, J. A., Simcox, D. J. & Hovestadt, T. Evidence based conservation of butterflies. J. Insect Conserv. 15, 241–258 (2011).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Riva, F. & Fahrig, L. The disproportionately high value of small patches for biodiversity conservation. Conserv. Lett. 15, e12881 (2022).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Schulze, C. H., Schneeweihs, S. & Fiedler, K. in Tropical Rainforests and Agroforests under Global Change: Ecological and Socio-economic Valuations (eds Bidin, A. et al.) 73–96 (Springer, 2010).

  • Habel, J. C., Teucher, M., Gros, P., Schmitt, T. & Ulrich, W. Land use and climate change affects butterfly diversity across northern Austria. Landsc. Ecol. 36, 1741–1754 (2021).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Konvicka, M. et al. How too much care kills species: grassland reserves, agri-environmental schemes and extinction of Colias myrmidone (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) from its former stronghold. J. Insect Conserv. 12, 519–525 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Konvicka, M., Maradova, M., Benes, J., Fric, Z. & Kepka, P. Uphill shifts in distribution of butterflies in the Czech Republic: effects of changing climate detected on a regional scale. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 12, 403–410 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • New, T. R., Pyle, R. M., Thomas, J. A., Thomas, C. D. & Hammond, P. C. Butterfly conservation management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 40, 57–83 (1995).

    Article 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Koh, L. P. & Sodhi, N. S. Importance of reserves, fragments, and parks for butterfly conservation in a tropical urban landscape. Ecol. Appl. 14, 1695–1708 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sant’Anna, C. L. B., Ribeiro, D. B., Garcia, L. C. & Freitas, A. V. L. Fruit-feeding butterfly communities are influenced by restoration age in tropical forests. Restor. Ecol. 22, 480–485 (2014).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Riva, F., Haddad, N., Fahrig, L. & Banks-Leite, C. Principles for area-based biodiversity conservation. Ecol. Lett. 27, e14459 (2024).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • León-Cortés, J. L., Córdoba-Aguilar, A., Rodríguez, P. & Rocha-Ortega, M. in Insect Decline and Conservation in the Neotropics (eds León-Cortés, J. L. et al.) 17–36 (Springer, 2024).

  • Merckx, T. & Van Dyck, H. Urbanization-driven homogenization is more pronounced and happens at wider spatial scales in nocturnal and mobile flying insects. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 28, 1440–1455 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Soga, M. & Koike, S. Relative importance of quantity, quality and isolation of patches for butterfly diversity in fragmented urban forests. Ecol. Res. 27, 265–271 (2012).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Habel, J. C., Samways, M. J. & Schmitt, T. Mitigating the precipitous decline of terrestrial European insects: requirements for a new strategy. Biodivers. Conserv. 28, 1343–1360 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Brook, B. W., Sodhi, N. S. & Bradshaw, C. J. Synergies among extinction drivers under global change. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 453–460 (2008).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Moore, J. W. & Schindler, D. E. Getting ahead of climate change for ecological adaptation and resilience. Science 376, 1421–1426 (2022).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hill, J. K., Hughes, C. L., Dytham, C. & Searle, J. B. Genetic diversity in butterflies: interactive effects of habitat fragmentation and climate-driven range expansion. Biol. Lett. 2, 152–154 (2006).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Minter, M. et al. Past, current, and potential future distributions of unique genetic diversity in a cold-adapted mountain butterfly. Ecol. Evol. 10, 11155–11168 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Santos, J. P. et al. Effects of landscape modification on species richness patterns of fruit-feeding butterflies in Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Divers. Distrib. 26, 196–208 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Di Marco, M. et al. Changing trends and persisting biases in three decades of conservation science. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 10, 32–42 (2017).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Molina-Martínez, A. et al. Changes in butterfly distributions and species assemblages on a Neotropical mountain range in response to global warming and anthropogenic land use. Divers. Distrib. 22, 1085–1098 (2016).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Boyle, M. J. et al. Causes and consequences of insect decline in tropical forests. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. 1, 315–331 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • van Swaay, C. A., Nowicki, P., Settele, J. & Van Strien, A. J. Butterfly monitoring in Europe: methods, applications and perspectives. Biodivers. Conserv. 17, 3455–3469 (2008).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Forister, M. L. et al. Fewer butterflies seen by community scientists across the warming and drying landscapes of the American West. Science 371, 1042–1045 (2021).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Edwards, C. B. et al. Rapid butterfly declines across the United States during the 21st century. Science 387, 1090–1094 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Lamarre, G. P. A. et al. Monitoring tropical insects in the 21st century. Adv. Ecol. Res. 62, 295–330 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Zografou, K. et al. Butterfly body size shrinkage: the impact of ecological traits across varied environments. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2025.02.06.636804 (2025).

  • van Swaay, C. et al. Guidelines for Standardised Global Butterfly Monitoring Report No. 1 (Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network, 2015).

  • Yau, E. Y. H. et al. Spatial occurrence records and distributions of tropical Asian butterflies. Sci. Data 12, 1004 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Jarić, I., Diagne, C. & Chowdhury, S. Moving beyond continents for global and inclusive science. Front. Ecol. Environ. 23, e2851 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Paterson, G. et al. iCollections – Digitising the British and Irish Butterflies in the Natural History Museum, London. Biodivers. Data J. 4, e9559 (2016).

  • Mason, B. M. et al. iNaturalist accelerates biodiversity research. BioScience 75, 953–965 (2025).

  • Troudet, J., Grandcolas, P., Blin, A., Vignes-Lebbe, R. & Legendre, F. Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences. Sci. Rep. 7, 9132 (2017).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Martin, C. J., Twambaze, J. M. & Riva, F. A nature tourism and citizen science alliance. BioScience 75, 358–361 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Basset, Y. et al. Conservation and biological monitoring of tropical forests: the role of parataxonomists. J. Appl. Ecol. 41, 163–174 (2004).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Sumner, S., Bevan, P., Hart, A. G. & Isaac, N. J. Mapping species distributions in 2 weeks using citizen science. Insect Conserv. Divers. 12, 382–388 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kelling, S. et al. Using semistructured surveys to improve citizen science data for monitoring biodiversity. Bioscience 69, 170–179 (2019).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosa, A. H. & Freitas, A. V. L. The role of citizens in conservation science: a case study with threatened Brazilian butterflies. J. Insect Conserv. 28, 1149–1160 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Rosa, A. H., Ribeiro, D. B. & Freitas, A. V. L. How data curation and new geographical records can change the conservation status of threatened Brazilian butterflies. J. Insect Conserv. 27, 403–414 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chowdhury, S. et al. Increasing biodiversity knowledge through social media: a case study from tropical Bangladesh. BioScience 73, 453–459 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Badon, J. A. T., Lahom-Cristobal, L. & Talavera, A. A. Philippine Lepidoptera butterflies and moths, inc. a new online resource for southeast Asian Lepidoptera. News of the Lepidopterists’ Society 61, 178–179 (2019).


    Google Scholar
     

  • Chowdhury, S. et al. Harnessing social media data to track species range shifts. Conserv. Biol. 40, e70234 (2026).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Johnston, A., Matechou, E. & Dennis, E. B. Outstanding challenges and future directions for biodiversity monitoring using citizen science data. Methods Ecol. Evol. 14, 103–116 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Hochkirch, A. et al. European Red List of Insect Taxonomists (European Union, 2022).

  • Pocock, M. J., Roy, H. E., Preston, C. D. & Roy, D. B. The Biological Records Centre: a pioneer of citizen science. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 115, 475–493 (2015).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Danielsen, F. et al. Involving citizens in monitoring the Kunming–Montreal global biodiversity framework. Nat. Sustain. 7, 1730–1739 (2024).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Turrini, T., Dörler, D., Richter, A., Heigl, F. & Bonn, A. The threefold potential of environmental citizen science – Generating knowledge, creating learning opportunities and enabling civic participation. Biol. Conserv. 225, 176–186 (2018).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Kelly, R., Fleming, A., Pecl, G. T., Richter, A. & Bonn, A. Social license through citizen science: a tool for marine conservation. Ecol. Soc. 24, 16 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Maxwell, S. L. et al. Area-based conservation in the twenty-first century. Nature 586, 217–227 (2020).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chowdhury, S. et al. Protected areas and the future of insect conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 38, 85–95 (2023).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chowdhury, S. et al. Three-quarters of insect species are insufficiently represented by protected areas. One Earth 6, 139–146 (2023).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Chowdhury, S. et al. Protected area coverage of the full annual cycle of migratory butterflies. Conserv. Biol. 39, e14423 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Fordham, D. A., Akçakaya, H. R., Araújo, M. B., Keith, D. A. & Brook, B. W. Tools for integrating range change, extinction risk and climate change information into conservation management. Ecography 36, 956–964 (2013).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Report of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity on the Second Part of its Fifteenth Meeting (Convention on Biological Diversity, 2022); https://www.cbd.int/conferences/2021-2022/cop-15/documents

  • Bladon, A. J. et al. Global biodiversity framework targets can drive action on insect declines, but lack robust indicators to prove their effectiveness. Conserv. Lett. 19, e70025 (2026).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria: Version 3.1 2nd edn (IUCN, 2012).

  • Edgar, G. J. IUCN Red List criteria fail to recognise most threatened and extinct species. Biol. Conserv. 301, 110880 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Pottier, P. et al. Vulnerability of amphibians to global warming. Nature 639, 954–961 (2025).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 
    CAS 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Maes, D. et al. The potential of species distribution modelling for reintroduction projects: the case study of the chequered skipper in England. J. Insect Conserv. 23, 419–431 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wright, C. J. et al. Evolution, genomics and conservation of butterflies and moths. Nat. Rev. Biodivers. 2, 186–203 (2026).

  • Langdon, B. Tackling potential bias in global biodiversity indicators: the relevance of considering local data and non-English literature. J. Appl. Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.70125 (2025).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Grames, E. M., Stillman, A. N., Tingley, M. W. & Elphick, C. S. An automated approach to identifying search terms for systematic reviews using keyword co-occurrence networks. Methods Ecol. Evol. 10, 1645–1654 (2019).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Ouzzani, M., Hammady, H., Fedorowicz, Z. & Elmagarmid, A. Rayyan—a web and mobile app for systematic reviews. Syst. Rev. 5, 210 (2016).

    Article 
    PubMed 
    PubMed Central 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Wallingford, P. D. et al. Adjusting the lens of invasion biology to focus on the impacts of climate-driven range shifts. Nat. Clim. Change 10, 398–405 (2020).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • León-Cortés, J. L., Lennon, J. J. & Thomas, C. D. Ecological dynamics of extinct species in empty habitat networks. 2. The role of host plant dynamics. Oikos 102, 465–477 (2003).

    Article 

    Google Scholar
     

  • Source link

    Related Stories

    Leave a Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *