New Delhi: Delhi Police have invoked the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and the Safety of Youngsters From Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act towards Swatantra Bhardwaj, the Hindutva influencer who bragged that he “cracked open” the top of a teenage content material creator’s father in the course of the CJP protest in July and “didn’t even go to jail” for it.
“This (POCSO FIR) is foundation a recent grievance given by the minor sufferer alleging on-line threats and harassment. Thus far, different main sections included: BNS part 351(3) for prison intimidation threatening dying, sections 78 and 79 for outraging modesty and stalking, and part 67 of the IT Act for obscene materials. Extra updates to observe. Our lawyer Shivansh Agarwal is at the moment within the PS and following up with the Police and guaranteeing they fulfil their commitments,” CJP’s Saurav Das wrote on X late Friday.
The 14-year-old lady, accompanied by Cockroach Janta Celebration (CJP) members, staged an indication exterior Parliament Avenue police station earlier Friday to demand the arrest of Bhardwaj and Suraj, one other accused within the case. They had been additionally demanding that the police invoke the cost of tried homicide towards the duo.
A senior Delhi Police officer informed ThePrint that relating to the demand to invoke the cost of tried homicide, the identical shall be thought-about on the idea of professional medical opinion.
The CJP had referred to as a protest at Jantar Mantar to spotlight its calls for for resignation of Schooling Minister Dharmendra Pradhan and an overhaul of the schooling system amid considerations heightened by the NEET (UG) 2026 paper leak. Because the protesters led a march in direction of Parliament on 20 July, violence broke out. Tear fuel shells had been fired, pellet weapons used, and a number of police personnel and protesters sustained accidents. Some 13 FIRs had been filed towards protesters, however they’ve now been quashed.
CJP’s group is at Parliament Avenue Police Station.
We are going to guarantee justice prevails. pic.twitter.com/3Kl8ysPcFw
— Cockroach Janta Celebration – CJP (@Cockroachisback) September 4, 2026
Weeks later, a podcast that includes Swatantra Bhardwaj, who claims to be a school pupil, is viral. In it, he’s seen claiming he “cracked open” the cranium of a content material creator’s father and “didn’t even go to jail” for his actions.
“I cracked open her father’s head. which part is added in a case like this. Part 307 half homicide is utilized. He had seven stitches on his head. He was virtually dying, and was going within the ambulance. His daughter stood exterior the police station and stated, if her father doesn’t get justice, she’s going to devour poison and can die,” Bhardwaj stated within the Hindi podcast.
He added, “Swatantra was out the subsequent day. I didn’t even go to jail. I used to be roaming across the total night time. All the world ought to know this.” Bhardwaj went on, naming political leaders. “Kapil Mishra is like my elder brother. These individuals (CJP) are saying a name got here from Kapil Mishra and I used to be launched. Kapil Mishra is my elder brother, Chirag Paswan is my elder brother, all of them. Inform me which chief you already know? Modi ji? Modi ji can also be my elder brother. I’ve everybody’s assist,” he stated.
Requested the place he received the sticks used towards protesters by plain-clothed people together with himself in the course of the CJP protest, Bhardwaj pointed at his shoe and stated, “This shoe belongs to Delhi Police. We don’t fill varieties to affix Delhi Police. We routinely be part of them.”
Bhardwaj, in line with his Fb web page, is a Delhi College (DU) pupil. From Patna, he at the moment resides in Delhi and recurrently posts content material about Sanatan and Hindutva.
Additionally Learn: CJP calls off 5 September agitation after SC allows quashing of all FIRs lodged over NEET protests
Case registered, motion taken
Questioning the statements made within the podcast, CJP spokesperson Saurav Das took to social media platform X, and requested, “Is that this true @CPDelhi? Prison gang members brazenly masquerading as cops—is that this not a really pressing safety risk within the capital of the nation? Is that this why the regulation & order state of affairs is so unhealthy?”
Is that this true @CPDelhi? Prison gang members brazenly masquerading as Law enforcement officials—is that this not a really pressing safety risk in capital of the nation? Is that this why regulation & order state of affairs is so unhealthy? https://t.co/l14aJdJq4n
— Saurav Das (@SauravDassss) September 3, 2026
Sharing a clarification on the identical, Deputy Commissioner of Police (New Delhi) Sachin Sharma stated in an announcement Thursday that a 38-year-old a resident of Ghaziabad, sustained a head harm from the kada (bracelet) worn by one of many accused throughout a scuffle on the Jantar Mantar protest website on July 23.
“He was medically examined by docs of Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, and the accidents had been opined to be easy in nature. The accidents had been made by a kada and never by any weapon,” the DCP stated. He additional clarified that “the misinformation relating to a crack in cranium is just not supported by information or a Medico-Authorized Case and is totally baseless”.
A case underneath related provisions of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita has been registered at Parliament Avenue police station. “They had been detained from the positioning and through investigation, Suraj Kumar (24) and Swatantra Bhardwaj (21) had been served notices as per regulation and had been interrogated. Due authorized motion has been taken, and a chargesheet could be filed earlier than the competent court docket quickly,” the DCP informed ThePrint.
Calls for for arrest
In the meantime, CJP spokesperson Saurav Das stated on X, “Enable me to let you know what precisely occurred after BJP-protected goon Swatantra Bhardwaj’s assault on Dalit man (identify withheld) at our Jantar Mantar protest.” Level by level, Das explains and alleges that “(Title withheld)’s cranium was cracked open.”
“The wound dimensions had been of such nice measurement that it clearly warranted an Try and Homicide cost within the FIR (Part 307 of IPC). The Police refused so as to add that cost. This part would’ve led to his fast arrest as it’s a cognisable and non-bailable offence. To keep away from this arrest, the police flat out refused so as to add this part,” he stated.
In the meantime, the Delhi Police have talked about Sections 115(2) (voluntarily inflicting harm), 125(2) (act endangering life or private security of others), and three(5) (widespread intention) of the BNS within the FIR.
The DCP additional clarified, “Any allegation of undue affect or interference within the matter is factually incorrect and baseless. The matter has been handled strictly in accordance with regulation and procedures.”
The 14-year-old content material creator informed ThePrint that she has recurrently been making content material about youth affairs, and had been going to the CJP protests. The incident occurred on 23 July, when she and her father had been recording movies of the protest for his or her social media web page. “My father started taking pictures the protest, when unexpectedly, Swatantra and some males attacked my father. This occurred inside minutes. The Delhi Police then arrived, and Swatantra hit my father with a kada that he was carrying on his hand. He sustained seven stitches in his head.”
This report has been up to date to include recent developments following its publication.
(Edited by Nardeep Singh Dahiya)
Additionally Learn: CJP protest: Of 2,873 history sheeters that Delhi cops seek to probe, 22 were ‘supposed to be in jail’