Islamabad, Pakistan – Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkiye have formally known as their new mutual defence pact the Mecca Defence Alliance, asserting the title in Istanbul after a gathering of senior officers from the three nations.
“There’s a secretariat that has been established in Riyadh, and the primary secretary-general will probably be appointed amongst our Pakistani brothers,” Turkish International Minister Hakan Fidan mentioned on Monday at a information convention after the talks.
Really helpful Tales
listing of 4 objectsfinish of listing
Fidan mentioned the alliance was based mostly on “worldwide rules, akin to respecting the sovereignty of different states, territorial integrity and never intervening in inner affairs” and it remained “open for the partnership and participation of another nation” within the area.
The assembly got here simply hours after Washington and Tehran traded strikes for the primary time in a month, breaking a lull in a conflict that has now run for greater than six months after the US and Israel launched assaults on Iran on February 28.
Discipline Marshal Asim Munir, the pinnacle of Pakistan’s army, and Deputy Prime Minister Ishaq Dar arrived in Turkiye on Sunday. Dar flew in from London, the place he had simply wrapped up a separate go to.
Pakistani officers had steered in latest weeks that Egypt may also be a part of Monday’s proceedings, to not focus on the defence pact itself however as a part of a foursome that has performed a key mediating function in attempting to finish the US-Israel conflict on Iran.
The group of 4 final met in Amman, Jordan, on August 5 and earlier than that in June in Cairo, the place it welcomed the signing of the Pakistan-brokered Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding between the US and Iran.
On Monday, although, the main target was on the three nations which have inked the mutual safety deal.
The Strategic Political and Defence Committee, created below the joint defence settlement that Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkiye signed in Mecca on August 7, has now began the work of turning that political declaration – that an assault on any one of many three states will probably be handled as an assault on all three – into one thing operational.
How its institutional construction will truly operate, together with when the mutual defence clause itself could be invoked, stays unclear.
Making the pact work
Pakistan’s delegation was led by Dar, Munir and Defence Minister Khawaja Asif.
Turkiye was represented by Fidan, Defence Minister Yasar Guler and Chief of the Normal Employees Selcuk Bayraktaroglu.
Saudi Arabia’s delegation included International Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud, Defence Minister Khalid bin Salman and Chief of the Normal Employees Fayyad al-Ruwaili.
![Pakistan's deputy prime minister and foreign minister Ishaq Dar arrived in Istanbul on Sunday, where he met Turkish foreign minister Hakan Fidan. [Handout/Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs]](https://www.aljazeera.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/1e693b84-15da-4eec-8107-52eab271e494-1788171871.jpg?w=770&resize=770%2C547&quality=80)
In response to Pakistan’s Ministry of International Affairs and Turkish officers, the agenda lined military interoperability, joint workout routines, defence industrial cooperation, together with joint manufacturing and analysis and counterterrorism coordination.
Fidan mentioned in an August 8 interview with the Anadolu Company {that a} everlasting secretariat could be based mostly in Saudi Arabia and its construction and remit had been nonetheless to be labored out among the many three members.
Whereas some have in contrast the alliance’s mutual defence clause to NATO’s Article 5, many impartial analysts have pushed again on the comparability, noting that the pact has no built-in command, standing power or joint military machinery of the sort that underpins NATO.
Tughral Yamin, a retired brigadier and senior affiliate at Islamabad’s Institute of Coverage Research, mentioned “an workplace or secretariat is a should” for the pact to turn out to be operational.
“It could possibly be in any nation, or it could possibly be a rotating workplace,” he informed Al Jazeera, pointing to NATO’s Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe, based mostly in Mons, Belgium.
A headquarters was already arrange in Saudi Arabia, he famous, after the formation of a separate Saudi-led maritime coalition this 12 months.
Sinem Cengiz, a researcher at Qatar College’s Gulf Research Middle, informed Al Jazeera: “These particulars have to be clear earlier than the settlement is distributed to the Turkish parliament for ratification.”
The pact’s full phrases, she mentioned, are unlikely to be made public till that course of concludes.
Struggle exams the pact
The Istanbul assembly comes days after Munir’s fourth visit to Iran this 12 months.
On August 24, he travelled to Tehran and met President Masoud Pezeshkian, International Minister Abbas Araghchi and Supreme Nationwide Safety Council Secretary Mohsen Rezaei in what Pakistan’s army described as a part of its efforts to end the conflict.
Pakistani officers mentioned the go to produced significant progress in direction of reviving the Pakistan-brokered Islamabad MoU and reopening the Strait of Hormuz. Pezeshkian, in flip, mentioned Washington wanted to alter its tone.
The optimism was not totally shared in Washington. Two days later, President Donald Trump mentioned the US was “not in a rush” over talks with Tehran.
On Monday morning, the US army’s Central Command struck two Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) rocket launchers on Larak Island within the Strait of Hormuz, its first acknowledged strike on Iran in a month.

Iran’s IRGC retaliated inside hours and mentioned it hit the King Hussein and al-Azraq airbases in Jordan with ballistic missiles and the Al Menhad airbase within the United Arab Emirates with drones though Jordan and the UAE denied that the bases, the place US forces are stationed, had been hit.
Yamin informed Al Jazeera that Pakistan’s credibility as each Saudi Arabia’s safety associate and Tehran’s trusted interlocutor would turn out to be more durable to maintain “if the proposed trilateral pact evolves into an explicitly anti-Iran alliance”.
Gokhan Ereli, a global relations knowledgeable at Istanbul’s Ibn Haldun College, mentioned the trilateral relationship predates the conflict, pointing to the decades-old Saudi-Pakistan safety relationship and Turkiye’s personal pursuit of strategic autonomy.
The true check, he mentioned, will come as soon as the combating stops.
“If the joint mechanisms, institutional secretariat and industrial coventures outlast the present cycle of escalation, it is going to verify that this pact represents a elementary restructuring of the regional safety structure,” he informed Al Jazeera.
Cengiz was extra cautious.
“October 7 and the following occasions, the autumn of the Assad regime and the tensions within the Pink Sea, have all contributed to reshaping the area’s safety panorama,” she mentioned, referring to Israel’s genocidal conflict on Gaza after the October 7, 2023, Hamas-led assaults on Israel, the ousting of Bashar al-Assad in Syria and Houthi assaults on transport within the Pink Sea.
Nevertheless, she mentioned she didn’t totally agree with the characterisation of the Mecca Joint Defence Settlement as merely “symbolic” or inherently “transformative”.
Umer Karim, of the Riyadh-based King Faisal Middle for Analysis and Islamic Research, informed Al Jazeera the conflict has uncovered regional safety vulnerabilities that transcend Iran.
“Israel as a strategic hegemon within the area” has “implications for all three”, he informed Al Jazeera, referring to Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and Turkiye.
The clearest illustration got here days after the Mecca pact signing when Israel struck the Abu al-Duhur airbase in northern Syria, roughly 70km (43 miles) from the Turkish border, saying it was preempting a Turkish army deployment there.
Ankara condemned the strike as an try and undermine the trilateral pact.
Who else would possibly be a part of?
Pakistan’s International Ministry mentioned the pact stays open to different states.
Dar mentioned on August 9 that the settlement was defensive in nature and didn’t substitute any current bilateral or multilateral association.
Fidan mentioned Ankara needs to finally widen the framework past the three founding states.
Bangladesh has gone furthest in publicly signalling curiosity. State Minister for International Affairs Humayun Kabir mentioned Dhaka has expressed curiosity within the pact and it will not be uncommon for an Islamic nation to affix such an association.
Egypt has taken half in earlier four-way safety talks with Saudi Arabia, Turkiye and Pakistan however didn’t take part within the August 7 signing.

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan informed Al Jazeera in an August 15 interview that Cairo’s accession was “doable”, saying the pact remained open to additional members.
Egyptian International Minister Badr Abdelatty has since mentioned Cairo is weighing constitutional and authorized points earlier than deciding whether or not to affix, a reference broadly learn as concerning Egypt’s current treaty commitments elsewhere within the area.
Throughout the Gulf Cooperation Council, former Qatari Prime Minister Hamad bin Jassim Al Thani has publicly urged all six of its states to affix.
Analysts are cut up on who would possibly transfer subsequent.
Ereli named Egypt “essentially the most strategically consequential candidate”, pointing to Cairo’s function as an anchor of Arab diplomacy and its latest rapprochement with Ankara.
Cengiz was extra sceptical of Egypt’s timeline, grouping it with Syria as contingent on how the pact develops.
She pointed as an alternative to the Gulf states because the extra probably near-term movers, naming Qatar, Kuwait and Bahrain.
“They have already got shut relations with the signatory nations,” she mentioned, including that they favour diversifying their safety partnerships past the US.
Karim, nonetheless, mentioned any enlargement would require settlement among the many three founding companions on committing to a brand new entrant’s safety, significantly if that state is itself weak to regional threats.
“There is usually a risk of both Egypt, Syria or Bangladesh becoming a member of,” he mentioned, “however it is going to take a while to develop the required understandings amongst all stakeholders”.