Iran, US set new conditions during Hormuz talks: What does this mean? | US-Israel war on Iran News

The US and Iran have exchanged new demands throughout negotiations for the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, elevating new doubts about prospects for a wider deal to finish their five-month battle.

Whereas the US has stated it’s concerned immediately within the talks, Iran has stated it’s speaking immediately solely with Oman, with which it proposes sharing future administration of the crucial waterway, by means of which one-fifth of the world’s oil and liquefied pure fuel provides had been shipped earlier than the US-Israel battle on Iran started on the finish of February.

Advisable Tales

checklist of three gadgetsfinish of checklist

On Monday, US President Donald Trump stated he would demand compensation from Iran for deaths and accidents linked to conflicts and assaults over a number of many years after Iran final week issued new demands for reparations for the battle and stated it might not reopen the strait till Washington meets its political and financial circumstances.

Specialists stated broader peace negotiations between the 2 international locations are unlikely to restart till the difficulty of the Strait of Hormuz is resolved.

“The 2 sides are additional aside,” Al Jazeera’s Tohid Asadi reported from Tehran. “They’re getting increasingly more distant on the subject of the opportunity of any diplomatic settlement.”

The newest developments threaten to additional complicate the talks between Tehran and Oman on future administration of the strait regardless of each Iran and the US beforehand indicating they want an agreement to finish the preventing.

Here’s what we all know:

What has Trump stated about ‘compensation’?

Trump stated Iran ought to pay compensation for folks killed or significantly wounded by means of Iranian actions.

“We’re going ⁠⁠to ask for cash for the injury they’ve finished over a 50-year interval,” Trump instructed reporters on the White Home. “So if there’s damages to be paid, I believe Iran ought to pay these damages.”

Then in a publish on his Reality Social platform, the US chief stated Iran ought to compensate households of the 17 US sailors killed in an October 2000 assault in Yemen on the naval vessel USS Cole, which was blamed on al-Qaeda not Iran.

He additionally demanded compensation for the households of Iranian protesters killed throughout antigovernment unrest in January.

“Additionally, with respect to the Iran negotiations, Iran must be chargeable for the damages and dying induced to the folks of Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Gaza!” Trump wrote.

Trump’s calls for got here after Iran stated the US ought to compensate Tehran for injury attributable to US and Israeli assaults throughout this 12 months’s battle.

The escalatory rhetoric from the US president appeared to battle with feedback made by his vice chairman, JD Vance, who on Saturday stated he was assured about reaching a cope with Iran and the settlement can be good for the American public.

Vance additionally stated Iran had instructed the US that it has “no plans” to impose tolls on the Strait of Hormuz – one of many factors of friction between the 2 sides.

Nevertheless, oil costs jumped greater than 5 % on Monday after Trump’s new calls for whereas costs rose once more on Tuesday as hopes for a deal pale.

What are Iran’s new calls for?

Iran says reopening Hormuz, which it basically closed to delivery shortly after the beginning of the battle, will depend on Washington taking a number of steps, together with agreeing to a set of latest calls for.

Six new circumstances introduced by Iran’s Supreme Nationwide Safety Council on Saturday had been:

  • An finish to US threats and insults in opposition to Iran
  • A everlasting finish to assaults in opposition to Iran and its allies in Lebanon, Palestine, Yemen and Iraq
  • The lifting of the US naval blockade on Iranian ports and the withdrawal of US naval and air forces from round Iran
  • Compensation for injury from what it known as two “imposed wars”, referring to the battle begun on February 28 and the 12-day battle with Israel in June 2025, which the US additionally joined
  • The lifting of sanctions
  • The unconditional launch of frozen Iranian property

On the similar time, Tehran stated negotiations with Oman over a brand new delivery association within the Strait of Hormuz, through which they’re to outline new delivery ⁠⁠⁠⁠lanes, have made progress and are of their “ultimate levels”, in response to Overseas Minister Abbas Araghchi.

On Sunday, Araghchi reiterated the Iranian place that there are not any direct talks with the US, however messages are understood to be being exchanged by means of intermediaries.

What does this imply for peace talks?

US-Iran negotiating positions over the Strait of Hormuz seem like hardening, elevating doubts over the prospects for a diplomatic breakthrough for a broader peace deal, in response to analyst Negar Mortazavi. Specialists stated it’s unlikely that talks for this bigger settlement may restart till the difficulty of the Strait of Hormuz and the way it will likely be managed is settled.

“Each side seem like placing ahead maximalist calls for forward of great negotiations,” Mortazavi, senior fellow on the Centre for Worldwide Coverage, instructed Al Jazeera.

Mortazavi stated the newest US stance is very delicate.

“Trump’s new calls for are notably problematic as a result of they introduce points that transcend ending the present battle. If compensation over protests and different previous occasions turns into a real US situation for an settlement, fairly than merely a negotiating place, it may make a deal extraordinarily tough for Tehran to just accept,” she added.

In flip, Tehran, she stated, can be in search of important ensures, not just for an finish to the preventing but additionally “assurances that the battle is not going to merely restart later, in addition to financial reduction after the battle”.

Tehran has beforehand indicated that it has misplaced belief in US negotiators as a result of the US has commenced assaults thrice on Iran whereas earlier talks had been happening.

In keeping with Tehran-based political analyst Hossein Royvaran, how the Strait of Hormuz standoff ends will come right down to which occasion has the best endurance.

“This equation now exists: closure vs blockade. However the query is, who cries out first?” he instructed Al Jazeera.

“Proper now, America is struggling: in petrol costs, in inflation, within the rising value of dwelling at house. There may be deep discontent inside America over this battle and its penalties for society there,” Royvaran instructed Al Jazeera.

“The identical is true in Iran, although in Iran there are justifications society finds acceptable: that this battle was imposed on Iran and Iran had no selection however to defend itself.”

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *